Apple vs Microsoft: the two mega-caps compared

BRVX lists Apple with up to 80x leverage and Microsoft with up to 100x. Over 30 days their daily returns moved mostly independently (r = +0.27), with volatility of 16.5% and 23.2%.

  • +0.27 30-day correlation
  • 16.5% Apple 30-day volatility
  • 23.2% Microsoft 30-day volatility
On this page
  1. Apple or Microsoft: the short answer
  2. Key differences between Apple and Microsoft
  3. Apple: pros and cons
  4. Microsoft: pros and cons
  5. Apple vs Microsoft: when to pick which
  6. How Apple and Microsoft make money
  7. Apple vs Microsoft on AI and cloud
  8. Consumer cycle vs enterprise cycle
  9. What moves Apple and Microsoft stock
  10. How both behave in a tech sell-off
  11. A relative trade: Apple vs Microsoft as a pair
  12. How the Apple vs Microsoft numbers are made
  13. Apple vs Microsoft: questions

Apple or Microsoft: the short answer

Apple earns most of its money from iPhones and a growing services business sold to consumers. Microsoft earns from businesses: cloud (Azure), Office software and its AI partnerships.

Both are among the calmer large stocks, so moves tend to be smaller than chip or EV names. On BRVX, Microsoft was the more volatile over 30 days.

Apple vs Microsoft: the numbers

AppleMicrosoft
ContractAAPL/USDTMSFT/USDT
Last close$340.65$541.64
7d change+2.0%+2.2%
30d volatility16.5%23.2%
30d correlation+0.27+0.27
Leverage5x–80x5x–100x
Fee, each side0.05%0.05%
Funding (long / short)0.0023% per 1h0.0023% per 1h

Key differences between Apple and Microsoft

  • Customer: Apple sells to consumers, Microsoft mostly to companies.
  • Growth driver: Apple on services and upgrade cycles; Microsoft on cloud growth and AI products.
  • Sensitivity: Apple to consumer spending and China supply chains; Microsoft to corporate IT budgets.
  • On BRVX: fee 0.05% vs 0.05%, funding 0.0023% per 1h vs 0.0023% per 1h.

Apple: pros and cons

  • Pros: Steady cash flow; large moves are rare outside launches and earnings.
  • Pros: Services revenue smooths hardware cycles.
  • Cons: Hardware upgrade cycles are slowing.
  • Cons: Regulatory pressure on its app marketplace.

Microsoft: pros and cons

  • Pros: Direct play on enterprise cloud and AI.
  • Pros: Recurring subscription revenue.
  • Cons: Heavy AI capex has to pay off.
  • Cons: Cloud growth rate is watched quarter to quarter.

Apple vs Microsoft: when to pick which

A consumer-spending view is closer to Apple; an enterprise-AI view is closer to Microsoft.

Lower volatility means a given move needs more leverage to matter, which also brings liquidation closer. Size on the numbers in the table, not on the name.

How Apple and Microsoft make money

Apple is a hardware company with a large software layer on top. The iPhone is still the biggest single product. Mac, iPad, watches and headphones add to it. Services sit on top of the devices: its app marketplace, iCloud, Apple Music, AppleCare, payments and fees from search partners.

Microsoft sells mostly software and computing power. Azure rents servers and AI capacity to companies. Microsoft 365 is sold as a monthly or yearly subscription. Windows, LinkedIn, GitHub and gaming add more lines.

The difference matters for the stock. Apple's sales depend on people choosing to buy a new device. Much of Microsoft's revenue comes back every year through contracts and subscriptions.

  • Apple: devices first, services that grow with the number of active devices.
  • Microsoft: cloud and subscriptions first, sold mainly to businesses and governments.

Apple vs Microsoft on AI and cloud

Microsoft sells AI as a product. It rents AI computing on Azure, adds Copilot features to its software and has a close partnership with OpenAI. It also spends heavily on data centres and chips to do this. The market watches whether that spending turns into cloud revenue fast enough.

Apple takes a different path. It builds AI features into its own devices and puts privacy first. Its bet is that better features give people a reason to upgrade. It does not rent cloud capacity to other companies.

So news about AI demand usually hits Microsoft more directly. For Apple, AI news matters mostly through the question of whether it will drive a new upgrade cycle.

Consumer cycle vs enterprise cycle

Apple lives on the consumer cycle. When people feel richer, they upgrade phones sooner. When money is tight, they keep old devices longer. Demand in China and other big markets also matters, both for sales and for the supply chain.

Microsoft lives on the enterprise cycle. Companies plan IT budgets a year or more ahead and sign contracts for several years. That makes revenue slower to fall, but also slower to jump. In a downturn, companies may cut new projects and delay cloud spending rather than cancel what they already use.

What moves Apple and Microsoft stock

Both report earnings four times a year, and earnings days are often the largest single moves. The things traders watch are different.

  • Apple: iPhone sales and guidance, the autumn product event, services growth, China demand, supply-chain news and gross margin.
  • Microsoft: Azure growth rate, spending on data centres, AI product uptake, Microsoft 365 subscriptions and any change in the OpenAI partnership.
  • Both: regulation. Apple faces rules on its app marketplace in the EU and antitrust cases in the US. Microsoft faces reviews of cloud licensing and software bundling.
  • Both: interest rates, trade tariffs and large index flows, since both are big weights in the Nasdaq-100 and the S&P 500.

How both behave in a tech sell-off

In a broad tech sell-off, Apple and Microsoft usually fall together with the market. Big funds hold both, so when they cut tech exposure, they sell both. This is why correlation often rises in hard weeks.

They are large and profitable, so in many sell-offs they fall less than smaller growth or chip stocks. This is not a rule. If the sell-off is about AI spending, Microsoft can be hit harder. If it is about consumers or trade with China, Apple can be hit harder.

US stock markets close at night and at weekends. News that comes out while the market is closed can show up as a gap when trading starts again. With leverage, a gap can move a position past its liquidation price before you can react.

A relative trade: Apple vs Microsoft as a pair

Some traders do not pick a direction for the market. They trade the gap between the two names instead: a long on one and a short on the other, for example AAPL/USDT against MSFT/USDT. If both fall together, the losses and gains partly cancel. The result depends on which one does better, not on where the market goes.

This only works while the two move together. When correlation drops, the pair acts like two separate bets. A pair is also two positions, so it pays two sets of fees (0.05% and 0.05%) and two funding rates (0.0023% per 1h and 0.0023% per 1h). Each leg has its own liquidation price. One leg can be closed out even when the pair as a whole is close to flat.

On BRVX both are synthetic perpetual contracts in USDT. They follow the price only. There are no shares, no dividends and no votes. Margin can be USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL or BNB. BRVX is not available to US persons.

How the Apple vs Microsoft numbers are made

Built from 30 days of BRVX daily closes on AAPL/USDT and MSFT/USDT, through 2026-10-14: volatility annualized, leverage and fees from the live tariff.

Leverage works both ways: a small move against you can lose you the whole margin.

Apple vs Microsoft: questions

Do Apple and Microsoft move together?

Often, as both are large weights in the Nasdaq-100. Their 30-day correlation on BRVX is +0.27.

What is the leverage on Apple and Microsoft on BRVX?

From 5x up to 80x on AAPL/USDT and up to 100x on MSFT/USDT.

Are Apple and Microsoft on BRVX real shares?

No. They are synthetic perpetual contracts that follow the price, settled in USDT.

Leverage works both ways: a small move against you can lose you the whole margin.

Related to Apple vs Microsoft